Web 2.0, minus the spam.
Get my Web 2.0 links 5.0 on FiverrThe web 2.0 backlinks delivered by nikhil were of high domain authority…
Most Web 2.0 links sold online are junk: spun articles, dumped on abandoned blogs, all in one afternoon. I've spent three years doing the opposite.
I'm Nikhil Batra. Link building is where my SEO career began, and Web 2.0 is one of the types I've built more than any other. Here's what that looks like in numbers.
4,000+
Web 2.0 links built in the last 3 years
150+
domains I've built them for
977
orders completed on Fiverr
5.0
Fiverr rating from 42 reviews
High DA
Every blog host I use is a high-authority name.
White hat
No hacked blogs, no spun gibberish, no automated blasts.
Not spammy
I drop any account that starts filling up with junk.
Drip-fed
Your backlinks go live gradually, never all at once.
The web 2.0 backlinks delivered by nikhil were of high domain authority and all articles posted were unique, and related to my niche
It was a real pleasure collaborating with Nikhil. His professional demeanor, quick replies, and willingness to cooperate made a strong impression. Right from the beginning, he showed a clear dedication to quality and upheld professional standards throughout.
Working with Nikhil was a great experience. He is very responsive and delivers exactly as promised in the Gig.
Well done!
Three simple packages and no hidden extras. Pick the one that fits, message me on WhatsApp, and I'll take it from there.
Starter
$8
50 Web 2.0 links
$0.16 each
A gentle first step for a new or smaller site.
Choose StarterGrowth
$15
120 Web 2.0 links
about $0.13 each
More than double the volume for less than double the price.
Choose GrowthPro
$30
250 Web 2.0 links
$0.12 each
The lowest cost per link, for established brands in competitive niches.
Choose ProCustom
Let's talk
Any volume, any pace
Priced per link
Bigger campaigns, tier 2 support, or a mix with other types.
Ask for a custom quoteEvery package is built on free Web 2.0 platforms, but the work of choosing them, writing for them and pacing them is what you're paying for.
Prices are in US dollars. Every package is drip-fed, so your backlinks go live over time instead of landing in one suspicious burst.
Compare the packages side by side
| Package | Starter | Growth | Pro | Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $8 | $15 | $30 | Quote |
| Web 2.0 links | 50 | 120 | 250 | Any number |
| Cost per link | $0.16 | about $0.13 | $0.12 | Per link |
| Delivery pace | Drip-fed | Drip-fed | Drip-fed | You choose |
| Report of live URLs | Included | Included | Included | Included |
| Best for | New websites | Growing websites | Competitive niches | Agencies and big projects |
Not sure which to choose? If your website is new, start with Starter. If you've been publishing for a while, Growth is the sweet spot. If you're up against strong competitors, Pro gives you the most to work with.
And if you're still unsure, send me your URL. I'll look at it and tell you honestly which one makes sense, even if that's the cheapest.
One thing no package includes is a promise of a specific position on Google. I can't control your final position, and nobody honestly can. What I can promise is clean link building, delivered exactly the way I describe it here.
Not every campaign fits neatly into a box, so I put together custom orders all the time.
Need a bigger volume? I'll price it per link, so it scales fairly.
Want a slower pace? I can stretch delivery over more weeks, so your profile grows the way a real one does.
Running a tier 2 campaign? I can point Web 2.0 links at your existing guest articles or citations to give them extra strength.
Want a mix? Web 2.0 works well alongside my edu backlinks and the other types on my backlinks overview.
Running an agency? I work white-label, with the same standards and your branding on the report.
This is the part most cheap sellers get wrong, so it's worth a minute of your time.
Real websites don't gain hundreds of backlinks overnight. They pick them up gradually as people find and share their work.
A sudden spike of 250 new links in a single day looks exactly like what it is: bought.
So I create your Web 2.0 links regularly over time, never all at once. The pace depends on your package and your website, but the principle doesn't change: steady growth that looks natural.

It also helps your SEO in a quieter way. Content that appears steadily looks like an active brand, not a one-off campaign.
It takes a little more patience on my side. It's worth it on yours.
Order on WhatsApp in 30 seconds
Fill this in and tap send. It opens WhatsApp with your order ready, so you don't have to type anything twice.
Cheap links cost you twice. Once to buy them, and again when they get ignored.
Get the clean kindAnyone can download a free list of Web 2.0 submission sites and start selling backlinks. That's exactly why so many are worthless: everyone is dumping junk on the same tired accounts.
I've built and maintained my own collection for three years. It's what sits behind 4,000+ Web 2.0 links for 150+ domains, and it's never "finished".
Most public lists are full of dead sites, sites that delete posts within a week, and sites that strip out every link. Building backlinks on those is like building a house on sand.
Every blog host I use is a well-known name with serious authority. I check domain authority and the overall health of each one before it joins my lineup, and again from time to time after that.
High authority isn't the only thing I look for. I also check whether new articles there still get indexed by Google, whether the host still allows links inside articles, and whether it's turning into a dumping ground for spam.

Blog hosts change. Some tighten their rules, some start deleting articles, and some get overrun with spam. When that happens, they come off my list.
At the same time, I keep adding new sites as I find them. That's why my collection stays useful year after year, while copied ones go stale within months.
It's also why I keep it private. The moment a good collection goes public, it gets hammered with junk and stops working for everyone.
Web 2.0 sites are free services where anyone can create a blog or a mini-website without buying a name of their own. Think of WordPress.com, Blogger, Medium and Tumblr. The service hosts your content on its own address, and that address already carries huge authority.
When I publish an article on one of these sites with a link back to you, you get a backlink from a strong, trusted source. That's the whole idea, in one sentence.
There are two kinds worth knowing about. Blog platforms like Blogger and Medium, where you publish posts, and site builders like Weebly and Wix, where you create a small site with a few pages. I use both, depending on what suits your niche.
Done properly, they help your SEO in several ways. They add authority from trusted names, give your backlink profile more variety, help Google discover and index your pages, and build topical relevance around your niche. They can even send a little referral traffic when a post gets read, which is a nice bonus on top of the SEO value.
They also help with building your brand. When someone searches for your business name, a few well-made Web 2.0 articles can sit alongside your website in the results, which gives people more confidence to click.
Done badly, they're thin articles nobody reads, and they do nothing at all. The difference is entirely in how they're built.
Tier 1 links point straight at your own website. These are the articles that link directly to your homepage, service pages or blog.
Tier 2 links point at your other backlinks to make them stronger. If you've earned a great guest article or a citation, a few Web 2.0 links pointing at it can help it pass more value along to you.

Many buyers use Web 2.0 as support for their main pages, while experienced SEO buyers often use it for that second level. Tell me what you're doing, and I'll set things up to match.
Here are some of the best-known Web 2.0 sites, so you know what people mean when they talk about them:
| Service | What it is | Good for |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress.com | Free hosted blogs on hugely popular publishing software | Long, well-formatted articles |
| Blogger | A free blog service run by Google | Simple blog articles |
| Medium | A large reading and writing community | Thoughtful, story-style articles |
| Tumblr | A microblog with a strong social side | Short, visual content |
| Weebly | A free website builder | Mini-websites with a few pages |
| Wix | A popular drag-and-drop builder | Branded mini-websites |
| LiveJournal | One of the oldest blog communities | Personal-style blogging |
| Jimdo | A simple website builder | Small, clean mini-sites |
| Strikingly | A one-page builder | Single-page profiles |
| Webnode | A multilingual website builder | Sites in other languages |
Which ones I use for your order depends on your niche and which hosts are healthiest at the time. Rules change, so my lineup changes with them.
How Web 2.0 compares with other link types
| Type | Control over content | Typical cost | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web 2.0 | Full | Low | Variety, brand building and second-level support |
| Edu | Little | Low to medium | Trust from academic names |
| Profile | Minimal | Very low | A believable foundation |
| Guest article | Shared with an editor | High | Strong, relevant authority |
No single type does everything. The strongest profiles mix several, and Web 2.0 is one of the most affordable ways to add variety.
A dofollow link passes authority from one page to another. It's the kind most people want, because it can help you rank directly.
The other kind is marked nofollow, which asks search engines not to pass that authority. Google now treats that as a hint rather than a strict rule, and those links still bring visitors and make your profile look natural.
I'll be honest with you: some Web 2.0 sites give dofollow links and some don't, and that can change over time. A real profile has both. Anyone who promises 100% dofollow everywhere is either guessing or not telling you the full story.
Dofollow Web 2.0 links are the ones that tend to do the most for SEO, so I lean toward blog hosts that currently give them, while keeping enough of a mix to look natural.
Contextual links sit inside the body of a relevant article, surrounded by text about the same topic. They're far more valuable than a link in a profile or sidebar, which is why every article I publish carries your link in context. Over time, what you'll usually notice on the SERPs is steadier movement, not overnight jumps.

Anchor text is the clickable wording of a link. If every link to your website uses your exact keyword, it looks forced, and that's one of the clearest signs of bought links.
So I mix it up. Your brand name, your URL, natural phrases like "this guide" or "their website", and only an occasional exact match. That's what a real profile looks like.
Tell me your target keyword and the pages that matter, and I'll plan the mix for you. A good mix is boring on purpose.
4,000+ links. 150+ domains. Zero overnight spikes.
Start my orderNo black box, and no waiting around wondering what's happening. Here's exactly how an order goes:
Message me
Send your website and package on WhatsApp, or use the order form above.
Share your focus
Tell me which pages matter most and the phrases you care about.
I publish over time
Articles with links in context go live gradually across my lineup.
You get the report
A spreadsheet of every live URL, so you can check each one yourself.
I'm one person, not an agency with a sales team. When you message me, you talk to the person actually doing the link building.
Every article is written around your topic, so your link sits naturally in relevant content instead of on a random page about something else. Your link always points to the most relevant page on your site, with anchor wording that matches what that page is about.
That relevance matters for SEO. An article about home fitness linking to a gym equipment store makes sense to a reader and to Google. An article about car insurance linking to the same store doesn't.
I also keep each article readable: proper headings, short paragraphs, and images where they fit. The goal is content that looks like a real person wrote it for real readers, because that's what keeps hosts from deleting it.
Good content on Web 2.0 sites also lasts longer. Blog hosts are far less likely to remove a well-written article than a spammy one, so your backlinks stick around.
A link only helps if Google knows it exists. I publish where new articles tend to get picked up, and I keep an eye on which ones are being found. Indexing speed varies from one host to another, which is another reason I spread your order across several platforms instead of relying on one or two.
When your order is finished, you get a full report with every live URL, the host and the page each link points to.
If you have questions about any of them, ask me and I'll explain.
After delivery, give it a few weeks. Search engines need time to find and count new backlinks, so don't judge your ranking in the first few days. A free tool like Google Search Console will show you what's being picked up.
Most Web 2.0 spam is easy to spot. Spun articles that make no sense, a dozen links stuffed into 200 words, the same account linking to a casino and a dentist on the same day. That kind of spam comes from software that churns out thousands of posts in an hour. It's the opposite of how I work.
I avoid all of it. Readable content, one link in context where it belongs, a sensible pace, and hosts I've checked. That's what keeps your backlinks alive and keeps your website out of trouble.
I'll also be straight with you about risk. No link is completely risk-free, and Google's guidelines are clear that links built purely to manipulate results break its rules.
Its systems mostly try to ignore links they don't trust.
That's exactly why quality matters so much. Clean, relevant, drip-fed backlinks are the kind that get counted. Junk is the kind that gets ignored, or worse.
If your website is brand new, has thin content, or already has a history of spammy links, I'll tell you to fix that first. Links amplify what's already there. They can't rescue a website that isn't ready to rank.
Follow those principles, and Web 2.0 becomes one of the most cost-effective parts of your SEO. Ignore them, and you're just paying for noise.
And you're dealing with someone with a track record. I started SEO in 2022, my very first project was link building, and I've completed 977 orders on Fiverr with a 5.0 rating, for clients in the USA, South Korea, China, Norway and many other countries.
You can read every review on my profile yourself. I'd rather you check than take my word for it.
If your site is a local business, Web 2.0 can also support your local SEO by building more mentions of your brand across the web.
Web 2.0 links work for almost any kind of business. They're especially useful for:
They're links from articles or mini-websites published on free services like WordPress.com, Blogger, Medium and Tumblr. Because those services have strong names, a well-made article with a link in context can pass some of that authority on to you.
The big, established names like Blogger, Medium and Tumblr all carry very high authority. But "best" changes over time, as hosts change their rules. That's why I keep my own collection updated instead of relying on old public ones.
It's a Creative Commons licence, not an SEO term. CC BY 2.0 lets you share and adapt someone's work, including commercially, as long as you give the creator proper credit. It comes up a lot when people look for images to use in blog articles.
It depends on the exact licence. CC BY and CC BY-SA allow commercial use with credit, while any licence with "NC" (non-commercial) doesn't. Always check the licence on the specific image or text before you use it.
Yes, when they're done properly and used as part of a wider plan. They won't carry a website on their own, but clean, relevant, drip-fed Web 2.0 links add authority and variety. Spammy ones aren't worth it at any price.
Many are, but not every host gives dofollow links, and that can change. A natural profile has a mix anyway. If dofollow matters a lot for your campaign, tell me and I'll weight your order toward the hosts that currently give them.
They can, as a gentle start. For brand-new websites, a small, slow package builds a natural foundation without drawing attention. Pair it with good content and a few citations, and you've got a sensible base to grow from.
Because everything is drip-fed, it depends on the package and the pace that suits your website. I'll confirm the timeline before you pay.
Message me before you order and I'll explain exactly how I handle links that drop off. I'd rather you know the terms upfront than be surprised later.
Ready for Web 2.0 links that actually look like they belong?
Message me on WhatsApp with your URL and the package you want. You'll hear from me directly, not from a sales team.
Get my Web 2.0 links